Research:

 

Published:

 

Articles:

  1. 8. Unrestricted Composition as Identity and Fundamental Quantification In Composition as Identity edited by Donald Baxter & Aaron Cotnoir, Oxford University Press, forthcoming
  2. [Preproof]
  3. 7. Anselmian Theism and Indefinitely Extensible Perfection Philosophical Quarterly, forthcoming.

[Preproof]

 

6. The Logic of the Incarnation History & Philosophy of Logic, Special Issue, forthcoming.

[Penultimate Draft]

 

5. Monism, Emergence, and Plural Logic Erkenntnis, Vol.76, No.2, 2012, pp.211-223.

[Preproof]

 

4. The Logic of the Trinity Sophia, Vol.50., No.3, 2011, pp.363-374.

[Penultimate Draft]

 

3. The Necessity of universalism vs. the possibility of junky worlds: a rejoinder Analysis Vol.70, No.2, April 2010, pp.296-29.

[Penultimate Draft]

 

2. Must There Be a Top Level? Philosophical Quarterly, Vol.59, No.235, April 2009, pp. 193-201.

[Penultimate Draft]

 

1. An Argument Against the Necessity of Unrestricted Composition Analysis, Vol.69, No.1, January 2009, pp. 25-29.

[Penultimate Draft]

 

 

Miscellaneous:

Commentary on Parts of Classes Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies, Issue 19, December 2011. (Commissioned for a special issue on the philosophy of David Lewis.)

[Penultimate Draft]

 

Review of "Logic in Religious Discourse" by Andrew Schumann (ed.) European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Vol. 3, No. 2, Autumn 2011.

 

Miscellaneous in Norwegian:

Gottlob Frege: utvalgte skrifter (Ed.) Pax Forlag, forthcoming 2012. (Monograph containing Norwegian translations of Frege's best work.)

 

 

Bastards:

On Composition as Identity

(These are some incoherent notes for a talk I have given several times in the period of 2008-2011. They are based on my dissertation "Composition as Identity" (UMass, 2009, available online). A too early version of it was justifiably rejected by a good referee a couple of years ago. Since then the core of what I say here has been superseded by other works of mine (and others), so I don't know what will happen to this one. I still stand by the spirit of it all, and some of the points I make are still original, but the particular way I formulate things here is ultimately incoherent, I believe. I put it here for the sake of the possibility of comments from interested parties.)

 

Home