Another musical enigma

Another musical enigma

Sir Edward Elgar

written and prepared in html by Eric Spierings


Introduction

The Enigma Variations are one of Elgar's most fascinating compositions. They have been mentioned in relation to our Publius Enigma, present on The Division Bell. For the moment, only small resemblences between those two masterpieces have been identified. I will come to them later, I hope. For better insight into these resemblences, and to give rise to new ideas, I'll first try to give you a better view at Elgar's Enigma. Because this Enigma hasn't been solved yet, I cannot answer all the questions. But I hope we will get closer to the answer of our Enigma, just by comparing those two.

The first introduction will contain excerpts of the text written by Stephen Banfield, included to the CD by the Philharmonic Orchestra directed by Giuseppe Sinopoli, Deutsche Grammophon GmbH. It gives a good view at the character of Sir Elgar and maybe at his reasons to write the Enigma variations. The original text will be in italics. My comments and explanations will be in normal text.


The Enigma Variations

The complete title is "Variations on an Original Theme ("Enigma") opus 36". Bassically, the work consists of one theme and 14 variations. I will list the 15 parts of it and the initials given to each part.

  1. Enigma: Andante
  2. L'istesso tempo (C.A.E.)
  3. Allegro (H.D.S.-P.)
  4. Allegretto (R.B.T.)
  5. Allegro di molto (W.M.B.)
  6. Moderato (R.P.A.)
  7. Andantino (Ysobel)
  8. Presto (Troyte)
  9. Allegretto (W.N.)
  10. Adagio (Nimrod)
  11. Intermezzo, Allegretto (Dorabella)
  12. Allegro di molto (G.R.S.)
  13. Andante (B.G.N.)
  14. Moderato (***)
  15. Finale, Allegro - Presto (E.D.U.)

Elgar and the Enigma Variations

"Among the myriad choices and decisions facing the creative artist, that of being ruthless with one's Christmas cards must be one of the least expected. Yet one only has to make a list of one's own 14 prospective Enigma Variations to begin to realize how much quick-witted judgement and imagination Elgar mustered in deciding who to include, let alone how to characterize them. No relatives, couples (barring the Norbury sisters and their 18th-century house in Variation VIII) or groups; no children, but one dog ("Dan" in Variation XI) as a quintessentially English extension of its owner (it had to be a bulldog). Parody must have been a strong urge, but it would doubtless have tempted him into malice, which is approached only in the portrait of the querulous Townshend in Variation III; and what about the characters' relationships with each other, and differing angles of access to and distance from Elgar? Might he want to say the same thing to more than one of them, or hide one behind another (which perhaps he did, eliding absence and regret, in Variation XIII)? We all like to manipulate our friends (one wonders how many of Elgar's would have been completely satisfied with this particular outcome, least of all those who were not included), and probably had to forego many an attractive schematic avenue in the interest of balance, clarity and objectivity. It is hardly surprising, therefore, if one or more overarhing metaphors remained unexpressed, be they to do with "Auld lang syne" and friendship, "Rule, Brittania" and the idea of "Never", the artist's loneliness, death (one half wishes to find the Dies irae peeping out from underneath the theme as with so many Romantic works), or any of the other enigmas whose solution the work invites to refuse.

Equally worthy of consideration, however, are Elgar's stylistic decisions. During the long years before he reached his maturity, he cannot have been unaware of the impressive hegemony exerted by German culture, in the philosophical and social sciences as well as music, to which they were becoming a weighty background. If, as was the case, almost every musician in the later 19th century agreed that it had all come together with Beethoven, then what was mattered was not whether Wagner or Brahms was considered the way forward but that the line of succession, the mainstream, was an Austro-German one. In the same way a hundred years later a young composer was under immense pressure to accept the international avant-garde, be it represented by Boulez or Stockhausen, as the only possible starting-point. Even Verdi could be seen (and still is) as a political necessity for stability amongst the musical great powers.

It is extraordinary, therefore, that the Enigma Variations, judged by Michael Kennedy "Elgar's orchestral masterpiece and ... in my opinion, the greatest orchestral work yet written by an Englishman", should offer in its stylistic matrix no acknowledgement of this mainstream beyond Beethoven (whose incomparable slow movements, and Elgar's conversation with Jaeger about them, are of coarse one of the reference points in "Nimrod"). In the following decade Elgar was to lean heavily on both Wagner and Brahms, not to mention Richard Strauss in In the South, but in 1899 his horizons were fixed on altogether flatter terrain, not, as might have been expected, English but French or possibly Franco-Russian. The aesthetic world of the Enigma is that of Gounod, Tchaikovsky, Massenet, Bizet and Saint-Saens. Unwittingly, Elgar was following the precept of Nietzsche and creating music which "approaches lightly, lithely, politely ... It constructs, organizes, finishes ...". He eschewed four-part counterpoint and chromatic voice-leading (the return for some spiritual purposes to Gerontius), relying instead on textures developed from the initial presentation of the theme: continuo-like bass and tune, counter melody in an enriched middle part economizing the functions of alto and tenor, and parallel melodic thirds and sixths. Thumbnail sketches succeeded one another with the poise of ballet numbers, encouraged by the rithmic ease of the theme itself, with its insouciant pairs of quavers (eight-notes) and crotchets (quarter notes) (originally planned as alternating pizzicato and arco); "Dorabella" even replicated some of the shape and harmony of Ponchielli's "Dance of the hours". In all, he never lost sight of the dimensions of the suite of divertissement until persuaded against his will to lengthen the finale.

But then Elgar had always excellent at the tidy, imaginative miniature, and it is characteristic that years after he had put together three he had written for the Worcestershire Musical Union in 1888 to form the Serenade for Strings he still referred to it as his favourite work.