Religious Education in Nigeria – A Case Study
by B. Aisha Lemu, Islamic
Educational Trust, Nigeria
Printed in Teaching for Tolerance and
Freedom of Religion or Belief. Report from the preparatory Seminar held in Oslo
December 7-9, 2002 (prepared by Lena Larsen and Ingvill T. Plesner,
published by the Oslo Coalition on Freedom of Religion or Belief)
The
presentation gives a brief overview of religious education in Nigerian public
schools as it relates to the concerns of the seminar. Emphasis is on Islamic
Education.
Historical
Background:
National curricula for religious education do not spring from nowhere. They
evolve over time as a reflection of the needs, perceptions and historical
development for the societies concerned. Nigeria is a country with a population
believed to be over 120 million, of various ethnic groups. Religion often
coincides with the ethnic group, but not always. Basically most Hausa-Fulanis
in the north are Muslims, and most Ibos in the south-west are Christians.
However, Yorubas in the south-west are both Muslims and Christians with Muslims
slightly in the majority and there is a fair amount of inter-marriage. Exact
census figures are hard to come by, but it would be safe to say that Muslims
are over 50% of the population, the remainder being Christians and followers of
African traditional religions.
Islam first entered West Africa
through trans-Saharan Trade in the 9th/10th century. It
spread among the rulers and the urban population and then gradually into the
rural areas. Scholars established Qur’anic schools and for many centuries up to
the colonial period, Islamic schooling was the formal educational system in
Northern Nigeria. The north was solidly Muslim apart from pockets of African
traditional religion in the remote or mountainous areas. With better transport
and communications during the colonial period. Islam also spread faster in the
south, particularly into Yorubaland down to Lagos and the sea.
The pattern of education in the
south and the north has been different. Christian missionaries were allowed by
the British colonial power to set up mission schools in the south from the
early days, and Government schools also were generally Christian-oriented. Any
Muslim student in these schools would be forced to study Bible Knowledge and in
most cases attend church. Conversion was frequently a condition for admission.
No teachers were provided for Islamic Studies. Muslim parents had a difficult
choice – to allow their children to get a modern education at the risk of
losing their faith, or to keep their faith and to lose the opportunity to rise
high in Government or the modern administrative system. This gave rise to the
establishment of private Islamic schools for Muslims in the southwest. However,
their medium of instruction was usually Arabic, so their products were equally
unable to join the mainstream of higher education unless they went to Arab
countries for further studies. For these reasons the Christian missionaries and
their students in the southwest went far ahead of the Muslims in western
education, and tended to look down on the Muslims as backward. There was, and
in some cases, still is, serious abuse of their educational and religious
rights and marginalization of Muslims in national development.
In the north, the situation was
different. The British here came face to face with the Northern Emirates – the
legacy of the Sokoto Caliphate established by the great religious reformer
Sheikh Uthman Dan Fodio in the late 18th/early 19th
centuries. After subduing the northern region by military conquest the British
established good relations with the Emirs and their people, and adopted
Indirect Rule through the Emirs. Change in education came slowly with the
gradual establishment of a few modern Government schools and Teachers Colleges
for boys and later for girls. In order to make these schools acceptable to the
people, Islamic Studies were taught with a farily traditional syllabus. The
teachers were almost always the product of the traditional Qur’anic schools and
the syllabus emphasized memorization of the Qur’an and Hadith, Fiqh (Islamic
Jurisprudence), the articles of faith and basic moral education.
For a long time Christian
missionaries in the north confined their educational and evangelical activities
in the remote, rural and predominantly pagan areas to avoid confrontation with
the Emirs. The British even set up the old Sharia Law School in Kano for the
training of Shari’ah Court Judges and Islamic teachers as early as 1933. Some
of its graduates were subsequently given scholarships to study Arabic, Islamic
Studies and Islamic Law at the University of London in the 1950’s and 1960’s.
I was privileged to teach at the
Law School in Kano under its new name, School for Arabic Studies in the 1960’s
after Independence and later to be the Principal of Government Girls College in
Sokoto for 8 years in the 1960’s and 1970’s – one of the earliest girls’
secondary schools in the North.
By that time, missionaries had
been free for some years to evangelize all over the north, but their converts
were mainly among the pagan tribes on the plateau and other remote areas. My
college which drew students from all over the north usually had a sprinkling of
Christian girls, perhaps three or four per class. While the Government trained
and provided Islamic Studies teachers, the missionaries used to send in their
own teachers so that the classes divided for Islamic and Christian Religious
Knowledge lessons. The school provided the books for both classes. Christian
girls were taken to church on Sundays and there were no religious tensions
unless the Christian girls insulted Islam, which happened only rarely.
As far as Muslims were concerned,
Islam was the religion. Christians were regarded to have deviated from
the truth, but as “People of the Book” their right to learn and practice their
religion was recognized and there were generally peaceful relations with them
in spite of the political stresses following the murder of the Muslim Prime
Minister and the Muslim Premier of the Northern Region by Ibo and other
southern Christian officers in the 1966 coup. These northern Muslim leaders had
been very tolerant towards Christian missionaries from the late 40’s and
thereafter, and even encouraged them to open schools for which they were given
Government grants in aid.
In later years more and more
Christian denominations piled in and in addition to the older churches –
Catholic, Anglican etc. based overseas, numerous Nigerian based evangelical
churches in due course began to spring up. Any member of a flock who fancied
that he had prophetic or charismatic qualities would form a breakaway church of
his own (from which he would derive substantial financial benefits).
This is why if you enter the town
where I live you will see the approach road through the suburbs is fringed by
hundreds of signboards directing people to these churches with titles like
“Mountain of Fire and Miracles Ministries” and others offering hope and
temporary escape from the harsh realities of life. Most of their religious
services consist of singing, dancing, clapping, speaking in tongues and
generally disturbing people in neighboring houses. Therefore when we picture
Christianity in Nigeria we have to take into account these thousands of
autonomous breakaway churches as well as the older denominations.
It is well known that Nigeria has
periodic religious riots, but it is worth mentioning that these are not usually
prompted by religious differences as such, but more by ethnic historical and
political rivalries or grievances in which religious difference is a secondary
issue. Even apparently religious issues such as the extension of Shari’ah into
criminal cases only led to violence in areas where there were already
ethnic/political problems. Otherwise Nigerian Muslims and Christians are quite
used to living side by side as neighbors in peace and cooperation as long as
they do not insult or throw scorn on one another’s sanctities. Even in the
midst of recent violence in Kaduna, some Muslim and Christian neighbors
protected one another from the rioters.
It is against this background that
we turn to the syllabus for the teaching of religion in Nigerian Schools.
The Syllabi for
Religious Education:
Syllabi for Islamic and Christian Religious
Knowledge were drawn up by State and Federal Ministries of Education since the
1950’s. These syllabi prepared students for the subject in the West African
School Certificate Examinations. The subjects were very popular.
In the case of Islamic Religious
Knowledge there were no textbooks in English until about 1968 – 1970. The
teachers, who were mostly traditional mallams (scholars) who passed through
Arabic Teachers Colleges would use Arabic books, from which they would
translate to the students.
With the production of books in
English written to the syllabus, Islamic Religious Knowledge became much easier
to teach. The Government-run post-secondary Advanced Teachers Colleges and
Colleges of Education ran three year courses in Islamic Studies (as well as
Christian Religious Knowledge) and the subject became widely available in the
universities. Gradually the Arabic speaking Mallams were replaced at secondary
level by English-speaking young teachers who were products of the mainstream
educational system.
Around 1984 Nigeria changed to the
6-3-3-4 system (6 years primary, 3 years junior secondary, 3 years senior
secondary and 4 + years university) and at the same time all syllabi were
reviewed by subject panels set up by the Nigerian Educational Research Council,
affiliated with the Ministry of Education.
I happened to be a member of the
panel for Islamic Studies (as it was re-named). We were given a completely free
hand to draw up new syllabi for schools, together with detailed lesson formats.
Whereas previous syllabi had been quite traditional, we took as our guiding framework
the question “what should a young Muslim know about Islam in order to live as a
Muslim when he leaves school, on the assumption that he will not thereafter
receive any more Islamic education?”
We therefore gave much more time
to issues such as the rights of women in Islam, the rights and duties of the
husband and wife, and to the moral teachings of Islam. We gave less time to the
historical details of battles and dynasties and more to the civilizational
values of Islam, as well as its impact on West Africa.
The way of teaching Islam and
Christianity in Nigeria is expected to be confessional, that is, students are
taught how to practice their religion as well as being taught about
their religion. Muslim students are therefore expected to memorize portions of
the Qur’an and Hadith and their meanings, to know how to perform the duties of
prayer, fasting, zakat and hajj, to evaluate the evidence for the authenticity
of the Qur’an and so on, as well as learning essential historical information.
The syllabus
covers 3 sections as follows:
1. Hidayah
(Guidance)
Sectioni
A: The Qur’an
Section
B: The Hadith
Section
C: Tahdhib (Moral Education)
2. Fiqh
(Islamic Jurisprudence)
Section
A: Tawhid (Belief)
Section
B: Ibadah (Worship)
Section C: Mu’amalat (Human Transactions) This
includes Shariah, Marriage, Divorce, Custody of Children, Inheritance etc.
3. Tarikh
(Historical Development of Islam)
Section A: Sirah (The Life of the Prophet Muhammad)
plus the leadership of the 4 Righteous Caliphs
Section
B: The Spread of Islam to Western
Africa
Section
C: Contributions of Muslims to
World Civilization
With regard to the relationship between Islam
and other religions, or between Muslims and non-Muslims, these are not treated
as a separate topic. However, under Tawhid (literally the Oneness of God) the
matter of unity, trinity or multiplicity of God/gods is taught. The rights of
“the People of the Book” to retain and practice their religions within an
Islamic polity is also covered.
Under the section on the Prophet’s Da‘wah in
Makkah (i.e. conveying the message of Islam to non-Muslims) emphasis is placed
on the Islamic injunction: “Call to the way of your Lord with wisdom and
beautiful preaching and argue with them in ways that are best…” (Qur’an 16:125)
Under the section on Da‘wah in Madinah the
emphasis is given to the practice of peaceful da‘wah, “no compulsion in
religion” (Qur’an 2:256), friendly relations with Christians in Ethiopia and
with the Christian delegation from Najran, and the Qur’anic instruction not to
insult the idol-worshippers or abuse their objects of worship. The section also
covers the political rather than religious reasons for the breakdown of
relations with the Jews of Madinah. The conditions under which the Qur’an
allowed the Muslims to defend themselves against the Makkan idol-worshippers
are explained, with the Qur’anic warnings against committing aggression and the
directive to revert to peace if the enemy inclines to it (Qur’an 8:61 – 62).
Jihad is also allocated a section where its
basic meaning is shown to be striving or struggling with one’s own self, or for
social justice, or any righteous cause, or under certain conditions, an armed
struggle or just war.
The syllabus also covers Islam and culture.
It emphasizes respect and acceptance of the admirable aspects of pre-Islamic
cultures (whether Arab, African, Asian, Western etc.) and rejection or reform
of those aspects of pre-Islamic or modern culture which conflict with Islamic
values.
This covers what may be regarded as an
outline and highlights of the Nigerian National Syllabus in Islamic Studies at
secondary level. The Christian Religious Knowledge syllabus likewise covers
mainly doctrines and moral teachings, with a little on the early spread of
Christianity.
Could these Syllabi go further
in Promoting Tolerance?
I would say that they could, but with caution
because of realities on the ground. It would be useful to have a component on
Christianity in the Islamic Studies syllabus and a component of Islam in the
Christian Religious Knowledge syllabus. However in the light of the rather low
standard of teacher training and declining standards of education generally in
Nigeria, as well as existing tension between Muslims and Christians, one must
beware of opening a can of worms. If the teachers themselves are staunch
Muslims or Christians, would they really be ready and able to explain the other
religion objectively? Or would they take it as an opportunity to say why you
should not be a Muslim or Christian? If on the other hand one were to invite
a Christian teacher to tell the Muslim students what is Christianity, or a
Muslim teacher to tell Christian students what is Islam, there would likely be
an uproar from parents and religious bodies complaining about proseletisation
in schools.
We already have this problem in some
Government schools of mixed Muslims and Christians where some Christian
teachers of “secular” subjects take time during the lesson to preach
Christianity to all, and where some evangelical students particularly in
boarding schools target individual young Muslim students and exert pressure on
them to convert. This leads to a lot of ill-feeling and occasionally to riots
which could even spread on occasion to the outside community. There are also
parallel cases of Christian students converting to Islam, but there is no doubt
that there is a lot more active evangelization by Christian staff and students
than active Da‘wah by Muslim staff and students. The Government has therefore
been very cautious in this area and has put the teaching of religious tolerance
within the syllabus of Social Studies rather than within the religious syllabi.
(It may be noted that under Nigerian Educational Law it is not permitted for a
school child to change his/her religion without permission from the parents.
However this is difficult to enforce, especially in boarding schools where the
parents can not monitor what goes on. If a minor does convert, whether to Islam
or Christianity it is quite common for the parents to cast him or her off, and
refuse to continue paying schools fees or even paying for the maintenance of
the young person.)
Private Schools
However these limitations of the National
Syllabus do not stop private schools from doing what they see fit to promote a
broadening of religious understanding and peaceful co-existence. In New
Horizons College, Minna, run by the Islamic Education Trust with which I work,
we have addressed this issue through a new subject which we have called
“Islamic Perspectives”. This subject is designed to help students who are often
confused by their exposure to the modern media as well as to some local
traditional cultural influences. The objective is that they should be able to
think as Muslims and view the modern world from an Islamic perspective,
accepting what is good and leaving what is harmful.
Towards this objective we use books that
present an Islamic perspective on life and on scientific knowledge and
discoveries, and video cassettes on the history of civilization and religious
belief, on the environment and on natural history (usually from BBC/ITV
television series) that form the basis of discussion. One of the books studied
has a chapter “Face to Faith” on relations with other religions.
In addition, all senior students do a course
over two years called “Da‘wah and Dialogue for Peaceful Co-existence”. In the
context of Nigeria this means peaceful co-existence with Christians. Students
learn what is the Bible and how it was compiled, basic Christian beliefs and
the early history of Christianity. They also learn how to treat other people’s
beliefs with respect even if they disagree, and to discuss religion objectively
without giving offence. The aim is not to convert but to develop a better
mutual understanding. The students also learn how to discuss popular misconceptions
about Islam held by some Muslims as well as non-Muslims.
However, it must be stressed that these
approaches are being tested in a private Islamic School. It would not be easy
to transfer them into Government secular schools as they do not have the funds
or the ability to buy imported books and video cassettes from Europe, nor do
they have resource persons of the right caliber and broad education to teach
them. Moreover it is most doubtful that Federal or State Ministries of
Education would recognize a non-formal subject that is not a part of the School
Certificate Examination syllabus.
It may also be mentioned that, generally
speaking, Muslim students know more about Christianity than Christian students
know about Islam. This is because Muslims are taught to respect and revere all
the Prophets from Adam to Noah to Abraham to Moses to Jesus to Muhammad (peace
be on them all). They are accepted as true messengers of Allah and role models.
Muslim students are also aware of areas of difference between Christianity and
Islam in respect of Christian beliefs in Trinity, divinity or divine sonship of
Jesus, original sin, vicarious atonement and on. There are also numerous
Christian programmes on television sponsored by the churches which are also
seen by Muslims. This knowledge does not flow both ways however. For example in
the South-Eastern part of the country where Muslims are very few, the
Christians know very little about Islam, which is seen as a Hausa religion that
has nothing in common with Christiantiy.
Would Changing the Syllabus
Help?
In the mid 1980’s a group of agnostic
humanists in some of the southern universities tried to replace Islamic and
Christian Religious Knowledge with a syllabus called “Moral Education”,
detached from religion so that Muslims and Christians could be taught in the
same classes. This however raised the question of who would determine what was
“moral” or “immoral” and what would be the religion or belief of the teacher of
the subject. Both Muslim and Christian organizations protested against it on
the grounds that religion is the source and ultimate sanction of moral values
in this world and on the Day of Judgment. They advised the agnostics that if
they wanted they wanted their syllabus for the small minority of unbelievers
they could campaign for it, but that the vast majority of Nigerians are
believing Christians and Muslims who want morality to be embedded in the
context and teachings of religion. The Government accepted this position.
Religion is a very emotive issue in Nigeria
and whatever change may be considered to make the teaching of religion in
schools promote religious harmony, it must be done with sensitivity and in full
consultation with all the stakeholders, otherwise it may backfire.
The teaching of the current syllabi in
Government schools is in no way a part of the problem of religious friction. On
the contrary, they help, in however small a way, to enlighten Christians and
Muslims about the true teachings of their own respective religions and
thereby protect them from false information. Religious friction is generated by
adult chauvinists and bigots on both sides who are generally not a part of the
school system. The children involved are mostly street children and other
unemployed youth who probably never went to school or dropped out.
While there are ways to build bridges to
foster tolerance and pluralism through schools, there is also a great need for
a serious campaign among adults through effective use of the media by respected
and responsible religious figures. There is growing resistance to UN-sponsored
programs being fed into the educational system without due consideration of
existing moral and cultural beliefs. In recent months it has been a Sexuality
Education syllabus introducing children to various sexual practices and
deviations. Details were reported in the press which caused uproar among
parents and religious bodies and suspicion of who is really in charge of our
educational system. Whatever is to be done in respect of religious plurality
must be handled with the utmost care and consultation in order to promote
mutual understanding, which cannot be achieved by fiat or force.