
Internet is the
fabric of our lives.
Manuell Castell
Introduction........................................................................................................................... 5
Executive Summary............................................................................................................. 6
1. TomorrowÕs School and Digital Bildung – A Vision.................................................. 7
2. Concept Definitions......................................................................................................... 8
2.1 The Fourth Basic Skill............................................................................................... 9
2.2 The Four Cultural Skills......................................................................................... 10
2.3 Digital literacy, ICT literacy.................................................................................... 11
2.4 Digital Transformation: ICT literacy..................................................................... 12
2.5 Digital Competence and Digital Bildung............................................................ 14
3. Consequences for Educational Policy...................................................................... 17
3.1 ICT Infrastructure, Computers, Broadband........................................................ 17
3.2 Curriculum and Study Plans................................................................................. 19
3.3 Teacher Education................................................................................................. 20
3.4 Forms of Examination and Evaluation................................................................ 21
3.5 Digital Learning Resources.................................................................................. 22
3.6 Organization and Structure in Basic
Education................................................ 24
3.8 Lifelong Learning.................................................................................................... 24
4. Digital Divides................................................................................................................ 24
Appendix............................................................................................................................. 27
1 Digital Horizons (New Zealand).............................................................................. 27
2 ITUÕs Competency Plan for Teachers in the
Project ICT in Multicultural Schools 27
3 e-Europe: digital literacy; e-skills,
e-learning, e-citizen...................................... 28
4 21st Century Literacy................................................................................................. 29
5 Sweden........................................................................................................................ 30
6 Canada........................................................................................................................ 31
7 Great Britain................................................................................................................ 31
References......................................................................................................................... 32
The
Ministery of Research and Education (UFD) has commissioned ITU to develop a
report on the concepts ICT as the fourth basic skill and digital competence (March 10, 2003). The basis for
this request was the need expressed by UFD to acquire greater knowledge of this
topic. The scope of the commissioned report is comprehensive, encompassing the
following themes, among others:
á
Account
of concepts Ó ICT as the fourth basic skillÓ / Ódigital literacyÓ / Ódigital
competenceÓ
á
Educational
policy recommendations (ICT infrastructure/broadband, curriculum, educational
integration of ICT in learning strategies and teacher education, testing,
educational resources)
á
Digital
divides
á
International
models (attachment)
As it was
not possible to address in depth all of the questions posed in the extensive
mandate, priorities had to be established. The following fields of inquiry have
thus not been fully addressed; organization and structure of basic training and
lifelong learning programs in ICT, and evaluations of social economic issues.
Through this report, ITU aims to contribute to
an innovative initiative that will support ICT and learning in 2004. Implicit
in the goal of digital competence as a continued initiative in Norwegian
education is the realization of the potential of ICT for better learning.
June 12,
2003
Morten S¿by
Director
ITU
Digital
competence and digital bildung [1] are key concepts in a new ambitious
national initiative supporting the use of ICT in education. Digital bildung, as the vision and aim of the
initiative, implies that national educational institutions will strive to offer
students in all phases of schooling the possibility of using ICT in a familiar
and innovative manner. This will allow students to develop the skills,
knowledge, and competence that they need to attain personal goals and to be
interactive participants in a global information society. This move toward
digital bildung
among students and teachers in the Norwegian educational system will require
that we begin with the development of a new curriculum. Curriculum that is
developed to educate students for an information society will entail, among
other changes, more relevant types of exams (digital evaluation means), the use
of digital folders, an extensive revamping of a stable, and maintenance secure
broadband infrastructure, the development of digital learning resources in a
national learning network, systematic upgrading in schools, and long-range
support from FoU.
A link
between the concepts information literacy and digital literacy gives meaning to digital bildung and digital competence. Information
literacy refers to:
a)
Fundamental ICT skills that include searching, locating, evaluating,
manipulating, and controlling information from diverse digital sources and
formats, and
b) The
development of communicative competence, in the sense of a critical,
interpretative, and analytical relationship to sources, digital genres, and
media forms.
Digital
literacy describes
the ability to develop the potential inherent in ICT and the innovative use of
the technology in learning and work activities. This entails a familiarity with
ICT and digital media and is considered a key concept in lifelong learning.
The report e-Norge
2005 emphasizes
that competence is societyÕs most important resource and a prominent factor in
building values and economic growth. European and American studies indicate
that the cultivation of digital competence will be one of the main driving
forces in economic, social, and cultural developments in the future.
Initiatives in ICT in education 2004-2007 must have vision and aims that relate
Norwegian educational practice directly to the knowledge needs and challenges
we face in an information society, and which situate Norway on par with
comparable countries that provide an education in digital competence, with
quality learning experiences and good teaching strategies.
The
development of digital competence is defined as a central goal in Norwegian
education. There is a need to consolidate the diverse plans and initiatives
currently found in educational policies. The support of ICT must be integrated
in education policy rather than channeled into supplementary resolutions.
ITU recommends that the development of digital
competence be prioritized in the following areas in 2004-2007:
Furthermore, ITU recommends
that UFD establish a working group to review and develop policy on
digital competence and consequences for Norwegian education. This group
should include researchers, experts, and Ópolicy makers,Ó and should be
considered in relation to the international field. The national working
group should establish an international network panel to work with the
concepts and recommendations for educational policy, and be furnished
with adequate resources for the work, with a minimum six-month time
frame.
In the future, schools will
use applications for texts and spreadsheets, drawing programs, graphic
images, digital video, games, and 3-D simulation as a natural part of
learning and evaluation activity. ÓExamsÓ will challenge and evaluate
studentsÕ digital competence, which will encompass information searching,
interpreting, understanding, and the design, production and critical use
of sources. The ÒexamÓ will focus on evaluation of a digital folder with
multimedia documentation of the studentÕs best work and products.
Teachers will evaluate student work during the course of the year by
monitoring the folder.
The school of the future
respects and utilizes the studentsÕ personal choice of media. Laptop
computers, handhelds (PDA), and cell phones (MMS) are integrated in daily
life at school and are part of the studentsÕ daily media use. There is
experimentation with different virtual worlds including the use of
computer games where students work with molecules and DNA. TomorrowÕs
school provides students with different learning settings, serving as a
laboratory for experimentation and with virtual spaces for continual
(re)construction of the studentsÕ experiences. Access to relevant
services and resources in a national learning network is available via
broadband for all students. Software has been developed based on the
actual needs of teachers and students.
The teacher of the future
combines disciplinary knowledge and digital bildung, and understands how to
realize the potential of different learning models in different
situations, varying the use of text-based materials and Internet. The
good teacher contributes professionally in different learning settings;
as inspirational, knowledgeable lecturer, coordinator in complex computer
simulated environments, advisor in cross-disciplinary project work,
critical navigator on the Internet and erudite user of computer games in
learning situations.
Researchers and curriculum
planners have outlined a conceptual framework for a new and important
fourth basic skill/competency/cultural proficiency. [2]
Broadly and inconsistently referenced in diverse educational policy
documents, the concept ranges from a description of proficient technical
skills to digital competence and digital bildung.
There is no clear
international frame of reference for the field; however, three main
directions or trends may be identified. One direction is linked to the
definition of fundamental skills in ICT: text, spreadsheet, and
presentation software, and Internet searching. A second trend is linked
to concepts of a fourth basic skill and cultural practice, and is
concerned with basic ICT skills in specific subjects. A third direction
works toward developing the concept of bildung with a focus on broader
digital bildung and competence.
Several international studies point
to the problem of a ÒskillsÓ concept, considering this too narrow a
perspective on education in general and learning activities in
particular.[3] In a
knowledge society, digital competence, and bildung are more than an exclusive focus on
the mastering of skills. Digital bildung expresses a more holistic
understanding of how children and youths learn and develop their
identity. In addition, the concept encompasses and combines the way in
which skills, qualifications, and knowledge are used. As such, digital bildung
suggests an integrated, holistic approach that enables reflection on the
effects that ICT has on different aspects of human development:
communicative competence, critical thinking skills, and enculturation
processes, among others. Through greater focus on the integrated use of
ICT in all subjects, teachers, and students will develop competence in
navigation and the critical use of sources, as well as a sense of the
social implications of digital technology.
A number of EU reports suggest
that insufficient competence and qualifications will hamper the
development of a knowledge and information society. The Cedefop report
(2002), ÓCompetence Building for the Future – Education and
Learning in Europe.Ó The report shows that businesses in Europe state that employees
lack basic, communicative skills (reading, writing, mathematics) and
fundamental ICT qualifications. This served as the background for EUÕs
initiative to support e-learning, basic competence, and fundamental ICT qualifications.
As most professional
occupations require basic ICT skills, many European Union countries,
among others, are discussing the need to consider these a fourth basic
skill. In the business world, the concept of this fourth basic skill is
linked to European Computer Driving License (http://www.ecdl.com/): A computer card is
a skills test that documents IT competence within the most typical areas
of computer use.
The computer card consists of
seven different modules from which one may choose to qualify in any
number or order:
After satisfactorily
completing the certified tests, a computer card is issued as proof
of IT competence. The computer card tests are based on an
internationally approved study plan. In Norway, computer card
tests may be taken at one of the 400 authorized test centers or
internally through larger organizations and firms. Although the
computer card is most common in firms and businesses, many junior
colleges offer the card as an elective. It is the most popular
elective, for example, at Ringsaker Junior College, where four
entire classes of 50 students each will complete the study this
year.
In 1998, Denmark
initiated the IT-leap, inspired by the European computer card.
This offer was made available to Danish teachers in elementary
schools and is a combination of three elements: a free computer
for home use, computer card tests, and an educator driverÕs
license. While the concept Òthe fourth skillÓ is not used
explicitly, such practices nonetheless argue for an understanding
of ICT as a new basic skill along with reading, writing, and
mathematics.
In the Swedish
competency development project ITiS (1999-2002), 75,000 teachers were
encouraged to master and combine a fourth basic skill with
disciplinary and educational activity.
The Norwegian
initiative L¾rerIKT builds on Danish and Swedish
programs, among others, and offers training for teachers in
elementary schools and high schools. L¾rerIKT is based on combining
ICT as a fourth skill with the disciplinary and educational use of
ICT. Two sets of course modules have been developed for elementary
and high schools, respectively. In Module 2 for elementary
schools, for example, which includes Òwriting, arithmetic and
numeracy,Ó the basic ICT skill is defined as:
Ability
to produce spreadsheets with cells and columns, enter symbols,
numbers and formulas, copy and format cells and text, make
diagrams (curves, column and sector charts), sort and calculate
sums and averages, evaluate spreadsheet layouts.
The concept fourth
basic skill may be defined as the sum of those fundamental skills
required for the computer card. As in the
examples above, the concept is used in several contexts. At one
level, the concept of the fourth basic skill may be useful in a
phase when fundamental ICT skills are lacking among school leaders,
teachers, and students, as it can contribute to the definition of
standards. It may also serve as a prerequisite when hiring new
teachers, for example, and thus encourage established teachers to
develop their competence. From a more long-range perspective, it
poses a challenge to the development of national standards that
combine ICT skills with practical professional and educational
uses adapted for different levels.
An
objection to conceptualizing ICT as a skill is that it represents
a static view of knowledge. A fourth basic skill must be stamped
and dated, and like the computer card, will expire after a certain
period. This is an argument for the concept of competence (the
Qualitative CommitteeÕs emphasis of the concept), which represents
a more dynamic and holistic view of the connection between skills
and knowledge. Experiences from experiments in school improvements
indicate that initiatives such as the computer card and L¾rerIKT are
understood as general programs that become outdated after a short
time. Norwegian teachers primarily need competence improvement
related to their own disciplinary expertise and the local
educational practice.
An alternative to the
concept of a fourth basic skill is a fourth cultural skill. The
notion of a fourth cultural skill was proposed in Bent AndresenÕs
(1999) book: School in Time. The book has been an important
Nordic contribution in the work with advancing the use of ICT in
schools. He describes the four cultural skills as follows:
First
Fundamental Cultural Skill: Reading both printed media and
screens, where students and teachers seek experiences and find
information via digital sources, such as reference works, CD-ROMÕs
and other learning resources. On the computer screen, digital
sources and multimedia resources supplement printed literature.
Second
Fundamental Cultural Skill: Writing with tools that range
from pencils to the production of digital multimedia texts,
digital music, web pages, etc.
Third
Fundamental Cultural Skill: Mathematical calculations:
mentally, on paper with pencil, with calculator, and with digital
spreadsheets, statistics, graphs, and applications.
Fourth Fundamental
Cultural Skill: Use of ICT as an extension of the three previous cultural
skills, from basic Òcomputer cardÓ abilities to the interpretative
and critical use of ICT in the form of digital competence.
The fourth basic skill
as explained above is based on a set of fundamental ICT skills
that are linked to relevant, educational use. The fourth
fundamental cultural skill is more integrated into the three
original cultural skills of reading, writing, and arithmetic and
is thus a more forward-looking concept. The concept of cultural
technique also reminds technology skeptics that writing skills were
also once considered unnatural, alien to the oral traditions that
were distinctly human. According to Plato (in Phaidros), writing
would weaken memory and consciousness. However, as we know,
GutenbergÕs controversial printing press evolved into books: a
natural learning resource in school, no longer defined as
technology but a natural means of mediating knowledge and cultural
inheritance.
Resistance toward the concept cultural skill seems to be
based on unfamiliarity and the fact that the concept is abstract
and not directly relatable to digital media or ICT. ITUÕs plan for
competence development for ICT in multicultural schoolsÓ (Vahl
Elementary School, Jordal High School and Elvebakken Junior
College) is inspired by AndresenÕs concept of cultural skills (see
attached).
Digital
literacy
and ICT literacy are concepts that arise in different contexts and have
varied definitions. The concepts are situated in a new
cross-disciplinary research field that is related to media
literacy,
media studies, and media education (Tyner, 1998).[4]
The concepts are found in popular science discussions and the mass
media (Gilster, 1997). The concepts are referred to in educational
policy documents from, for example, OECD, EU and in national
initiatives (New Zealand and Singapore). In this report, we will
primarily consider the use of the concept in educational policy.
In the book
Digital Literacy, Paul Gilster has contributed to the
following definition of the concept: Ó É the ability to understand
and use information in multiple formats from a wide range
of sources when it is presented via computers.Ó This encompasses,
Gilster continues: ÓÉbeing able to understand a problem and
develop a set of questions that will solve that information need.Ó
He
adds: ÓDeveloping the habit of critical thinking and using
network tools to reinforce it is the most significant of the
networkÕs core competenciesÓ (Gilster, 1997, p. 33).
Although
GilsterÕs book is popular science, his definition has had great influence
in educational policy debates. The Ministry of Education in New
Zealand has made an ambitious plan for supporting ICT in
education, with Digital Literacy and Information Literacy figuring prominently.
In Digital Horizons. A strategy for schools for 2002-2004, information
literacy
is defined as
Éthe ability to
locate, evaluate, manipulate, manage, and communicate information
from different sources. As learners become increasingly
information-literate, they develop skills in discrimination, interpretation,
and critical analysis. ICT offers opportunities for higher-order
thinking and creativity in processing, constructing, and conveying
knowledge.[5]
This is similar to
definitions in reports by the Educational Testing Service (ETS)
and EU. The definition of digital literacy is cited from the same
source:
Éthe ability to
appreciate the potential of ICT to support innovation in
industrial, business and creative processes. Learners need to gain
the confidence, skills, and discrimination to adopt ICT in
appropriate ways. Digital literacy is seen as a Ôlife skillÕ in
the same way as literacy and numeracy.
These
examples illustrate how digital literacy and information
literacy are used as guides in a national plan, providing ambitions
and goals. As seen above, the two concepts are given different
definitions, with New ZealandÕs interpretation unique in terms of
the emphasis on digital literacy being linked to innovation and
creative processes.
In 2001,
Educational Testing Service (ETS) in the USA assembled an
international panel in order to study ÒÉthe growing importance
of existing and emerging (ICT) and their relationship to
literacy.Ó The panel was composed of experts, Ópolicymakers,"
and researchers in Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, and the USA.
In the report Digital Transformation. A Framework for ICT
Literacy, the concept ICT literacy is defined accordingly:
ICT literacy is using digital technology,
communications tools, and/or networks to access, manage,
integrate, evaluate, and create information in order to function
in a knowledge society. The panelÕs definition reflects the notion
of ICT literacy as a continuum, which allows the measurement of
various aspects of literacy, from daily life skills to the
transformative benefits of ICT proficiency. (http://www.ets.org/research/ictliteracy/ictreport.pdf)
ETS
presents five critical components that represent a set of
proficiencies and knowledge. In the report, it is emphasized that
this set enters into a development of increased cognitive
complexity.
After
discussions regarding the kinds of tasks represented by each
component, the panel agreed on the following definitions:

Access - knowing about and
knowing how to collect and/or retrieve information.
Manage - applying an existing
organizational or classification scheme.
Integrate - interpreting and
representing information. It involves summarizing, comparing and
contrasting.
Evaluate - making judgments
about the quality, relevance, usefulness, or efficiency of
information.
Create - generating
information by adapting, applying, designing, inventing, or
authoring information.Ó
This
five-stage model is expanded with two underlying cognitive and
technical proficiencies:

The three
proficiencies, then, are defined as follows:
Cognitive
Proficiency — the desired foundational skills of everyday life
at school, at home, and at work. Literacy, numeracy, problem
solving, and spatial/visual literacy demonstrate these
proficiencies.
Technical
Proficiency — the basic components of digital literacy. It
includes a foundational knowledge of hardware, software
applications, networks, and elements of digital technology.
ICT Proficiency — the
integration and application of cognitive and technical skills. ICT
proficiencies are seen as enablers; that is, they allow
individuals to maximize the capabilities of technology. At the
highest level, ICT proficiencies result in innovation, individual
transformation, and societal change.
http://www.ets.org/research/ictliteracy/ictreport.pdf
Based on
this concept of ICT literacy, the report suggests a revision
of curriculum adapted to the various levels of skills and age
groups. Corresponding new exam forms are recommended that may
measure and document digital competence.
The ETS
report emphasizes that ICT is a catalyst for change in education
and that ICT literacy
-
should not be primarily defined as a mastering of static
technical skills,
-
requires basic skills (reading, writing, arithmetic),
-
includes critical thinking and problem solving,
-
includes the use of digital media, communication tools
and/or tools to access, control, classify, integrate, evaluate,
and create information to function in a knowledge-based society,
-
will be in continual, dynamic change.
The ETS
report is a good point of departure for strengthening UFDÕs
awareness of the field. Although it was written in 2001, the solid
nature of the report has made it a relevant tool for educational
policymakers. A weakness with the ICT literacy concept in the ETS
report is that it does not emphasize innovation, problem solving,
and collaboration, and it is for this reason in particular that
ITU recommends the concepts digital competence and digital bildung.
In an information
society, it is difficult to distinguish a fourth cultural
proficiency solely related to ICT. Reading, writing, and
mathematics, which could previously be classified as fundamental
analogue cultural skills, are already in the process of becoming
digitized. Students and teachers do not read only books, but read
and interpret text in the broader sense on screens. Students and
teachers write with a pencil but they also make multimedia texts.
Arithmetic can be done on paper, with a calculator or by means of
a digital spreadsheet. Therefore, an updated bildung concept is more in
keeping with the challenges of an information and knowledge
society.
A digital bildung concept may be seen as
an updating of the bildung perspective already found in the
curriculum at the elementary and high school levels, which
emphasizes the creative, working, well-rounded, collaborative,
environmentally conscious, integrated aspects of humankind.[6]
A number of aims have also been formulated regarding an education
that promotes bildung on three different levels:
competence; ability, qualifications; knowledge, and identity;
independence and reflection. It is a given that students in
schools learn the three analogue cultural skills of reading,
writing, and calculating, while digital competence or cultural
skills are not incorporated in the curriculum.
A link between the
concepts information literacy and digital literacy gives meaning to
digital bildung and digital competence. Information literacy refers to
a) fundamental ICT
skills that include searching, locating, evaluating, manipulating,
and controlling information from diverse digital sources and formats;
b) the development of
communicative competence, in the sense of a critical,
interpretative, and analytical relationship to sources, digital
genres, and media forms.
Digital literacy describes the ability
to develop the potential inherent in ICT and the innovative use of
the technology in learning and work activities. This entails a
familiarity with ICT and digital media and is considered a key
concept in lifelong learning.[7]
In an
information society, digital bildung and competence will be
considered more important than skills and proficiencies since bildung expresses a holistic
understanding of how individuals learn and how they develop their
identity. Bildung thus encompasses and combines the use of skills,
qualifications, and knowledge. As such, digital bildung points to an
integrated holistic approach that enables us to reflect
meta-learning, communicative competence, social competence, etc.
Several
international studies indicate that skills concepts give too
narrow a perspective on education and learning activity. Based on
an increased international interest in results and effects of
education, as well as the need for common frames of reference for
identifying and analyzing so-called key competencies, OECD invited
member countries to participate in a four-year project. The
project is called DeSeCo (Definition and Selection of
Competences), with the final report released in November 2002. Here,
competence is defined as Òthe ability to meet demands or
carry out a task successfully, and consists of both cognitive and
non-cognitive dimensions.Ó
DeSeCo
focuses on three categories of key competencies that are important
in different life situations, and which are defined as essential
for everyone. In the DeSeCo report, it is emphasized that the selection
and definition of key concepts must be made in keeping with what
the respective societies consider important among individuals, in
groups and institutions within the society as a whole.

The DeSeCo
report has been the basis for international work with a competency
concept. The use of a competency concept in connection with
elementary education is relatively new, although it has been used
in adult education and has through lifelong learning become a
central concept in education policy, curriculum planning and
quality evaluations.
The resolution adopted
by the Quality Committee In the First Row (2003) emphasizes that
elementary school education today must focus on basic skills to a
greater degree, and has defined these as fundamental skills,
social competency and good learning strategies. Digital competence
is situated alongside skills in writing, reading, and arithmetic.
The Quality Committee distinguishes between different types of
competencies such as user proficiency, digital practice and super
user competence. The digital practice concept signals a
willingness to use new technology, and the Committee emphasizes
that digital competence is linked to both the bildung aspect and the skills
requirements in schools.
Digital bildung may also
be defined as a vision, and should be considered a contribution to
a new ambitious national initiative supporting ICT in education.
This requires all educational institutions to strive to offer
students a possibility to use ICT in a familiar and innovative
manner in order to develop the skills, knowledge and competence
they need to achieve personal goals and become interactive
participants in a global information society. Digital bildung will
entail the development of a curriculum for an information society
that facilitates a digital Òexam,Ó expansion of a stable and
maintainable ICT infrastructure with broadband, the development of
digital learning resources, systematic school improvements, and
long-range support from the National Research Council.
Both European and
American studies suggest that digital bildung and the development of
digital competence will become the driving forces in future
economic, social and cultural growth. There will be no lack of
information in Norway in the future; the challenge will to an
ever-increasing degree lie in developing competencies and the
ability to learn throughout life. In an information society,
knowledge is the most important resource and learning the most
important process; digital bildung and digital competence are thus
key concepts for further work with visions, goals and policy in
Norwegian education initiatives. A new national strategy for ICT
in education (2004-2007) is built on long-rang and ambitious plans
based on digital competence and digital bildung.
Mastering ICT becomes
one of the fundamental skills for todayÕs children and youth,
because this comprises a central area for competitive skills and
developmental possibilities in an information society. This
entails a large responsibility for central authorities, in order
to insure that todayÕs youth develop adequate competencies. An
international movement may now be seen, as countries ready
themselves to meet the digital challenges and utilize the
potential of ICT.
In the eEurope plan approved by
European leaders in Lisbon in March 2000, EU describes the
following goal:
Éto
become the most competitive and dynamic knowledge based economy in
the world capable of sustainable economic growth with more and
better jobs and greater social cohesion.
This is
followed up in e-Learning – Designing Tomorrow's
Education (Commission of the European Communities 2002):
eLearning seeks to mobilise
the educational and cultural communities, as well as the economic
and social players in Europe, in order to speed up changes in the
education and training systems for Europe's move to a
knowledge-based society.
Digital competence and
digital bildung are central concepts in EUÕs plans:
The first essential
stage in this move is the acquisition by the citizens of Europe of
the confident use of the new tools for accessing knowledge and the
widespread development of a 'digital literacy' – adapted to
the different learning contexts and target groupsÉthe emergence of
the knowledge-based society implies that
every citizen must be 'digitally literate' and basic skills in order to be on a better
footing in terms of equal opportunities in a world in which
digital functions are proliferating.
Norway ought to have
the same level of ambition as EU, that is, a prioritizing of
digital competence as a central goal in further educational policy
initiatives.
ITU recommends:
An inter-departmental
initiative (anchored in the e-Norway plan) is necessary to
meet the demands of digital competence: more computers for
teachers and students, better infrastructure and broadband access.
Computer equipment
Maintenance
and stability
Broadband
ITU recommends
full-scale national coordination (national departments, state
organs, municipal organizations, and private firms) in
building an ICT infrastructure based on broadband. ADSL is a
solution for the private market calculated for one household.
Deliberate efforts must be made to insure access to Internet
and broadband in Norwegian schools that will be on par with
schools in other countries. This network must be dimensioned
to accommodate upgrades and better solutions as they become
available.
ITUÕs
recommendations are based on the report on broadband from the
H¯YKOM School (0.9 version). Flexible learning arenas with
digital competence mean that broadband in schools must be
dimensioned in relation to the following developments.
Work
methods in school: how ICT is used in differentiated and
collaborative learning activities. This is also related to
the organization in schools toward greater openness and
flexibility in time and place for learning.
á
Downloading of digital
content that demands large bandwidth, such as sound,
pictures, film, streamed video and simulations.
á
Distribution of student and
teacher productions based on the use of digital tools such as
sound, photos, and video.
á
Collaboration on the Internet
in real time with sound and video and/or with use of digital
tools for shared editing of sound and video, or real time
interaction in 3D simulations and Internet games.
á
Technical relationships, such
as computer equipment age and placement, selection of server
solutions, maintenance, and the Internet structure, together
with developments within formatting technology for video and
solutions for temporary storage of large data quantities.
á
The number of simultaneous
online users at the school.
Based on the goals
of digital competence there is no basis for evaluating the
need for broadband in elementary schools differently from
high schools. The H¯YKOM school report has developed the
following estimates for different school sizes, based on an
evaluation of the expected need for large bandwidth in
approximately 5 to 6 years:
Internet structures
It is impossible to recommend a specific solution
in this regard, as the criteria for evaluation and the
choice of solution will vary from place to place. Many
schools and school owners will nonetheless benefit from
an overview of different solutions. A report should be
prepared concerning various network structures, costs,
and financing models.
In 1994, Reform 94 was put into effect at
the higher education level. Under this reform, the
subject ÓInformation Management and EconomyÓ was
introduced into the general curriculum. Schools were
mandated to procure computer equipment within a five year
period that would make it possible to offer the IT
course, and this led to comprehensive investments in
these schools. However, ICT was not incorporated in the
general curriculum in a systematic manner.
In 1997, a new curriculum reform titled L97 was
introduced at the elementary school level. The reform
included a clause that specified that the IT portion of
the curriculum could be realized only to the extent that
computers were available, and municipalities were not
mandated to procure the computer equipment for the
schools. In the Annual Plan for 2003 that deals
with ICT in Norwegian education, this clause has been
removed.
ITUÕs assessment is that the lack of anchoring of
ICT in the curriculum has retarded this aspect of school
development; without national stipulations and clear
goals about the competencies that students should develop
in relation to ICT, practice in schools is haphazard and
quality is difficult to evaluate. Initiatives for ICT
have been developed independently of curriculum and
course plans, and educational reforms have had an
ÒanalogueÓ agenda. Neither do the new guidelines for
teacher education call for digital competence.
There are no clear and systematically updated
concepts of ICT in the curriculum, which also fails to
make a connection to children and adolescentsÕ digital
culture and how it contributes to the development of
their digital competence. ICT is mentioned solely as a
tool that one may choose to use and competence in
ICT is described in the sense of a static skills
perspective.
ITU recommends:
The development of a new curriculum based the
concepts of digital bildung and digital
competence, with clear national goals for student digital
competence adapted for different age groups and subjects.
The revision of courses and curriculum in order to
include digital competence as a basic proficiency, with
the cultivation of skills emphasized. Aims for digital
competence should be included and viewed in conjunction
with the more general goals for education and learning.
The new educational policy guidelines for general
teacher education established by UFD (March 4, 2002) do
not include the goal of educating teachers with digital
competence. The guidelines thus break with the ambitions
for teachersÕ professional development stated in e-Norway
2005, and do not build on the aims outlined in ICT
in Norwegian Education. Plan for 2000-2003. The
guidelines are characterized by a ÓmassagingÓ of existing
teacher education in its present form, and represent a
retreat from national initiatives to promote ICT in
education. It is thus important to emphasize that ICT
plays a decisive role in the modernization of teacher
education, and digital competence is the basis for the
teacher of the future in tomorrowÕs schools. ICT is
consistently insufficiently integrated in the educational
guidelines.
PLUTO projects have contributed to an increase
in learning quality with ICT, which was acknowledged
when the Institute for Teacher Education (ILS),
University of Oslo, received the Education Quality
Award 2003 for the Pluto project Practical
Education in Digital Learning Environments.
Secretary of State Bj¿rn Haugstad from UFD presented
the award in Troms¿ on May 6, during the conference
"Quality Reform and Education Quality"
arranged by NOKUT (National Organization for Quality
in Education).
In his presentation, Haugstad made the
following statement: ÓTeacher education at ILS has
achieved a completely new profile through the
comprehensive use of ICT resources for all study
units, including practical classroom experience. The
technology has been a driving force in reform work
that has produced significant changes in study and
learning forms, with increased emphasis on student
activity and practical learning methods, case
methodology, digital learning folders and exams.Ó
ITU recommends:
Revitalizing and refining
the PLUTO program with an emphasis on digital
competence in relation to subject matter, pedagogy,
and innovation. A new updated policy for general
teacher education is needed that builds on digital
competence and is coordinated with national
initiatives within ICT.
The traditional forms of evaluation and
examination that are used today do not correspond
with the aims of ICT projects and plans. Examinations
largely impact on pedagogy, organization, and use of
ICT in schools, and must thus be considered a
catalyst of change.
ITU recommends:
New digital means of evaluation based on
national standards for the respective disciplines and
levels. Evaluation of digital competence must be
adapted for various aspects of such competencies. To
date, few studies have been made that attempt to
identify good evaluation forms that accommodate
different aspects of digital competence.
At a fundamental level, one must question what
one actually wants to measure, and concentrate the
evaluation in relation to digital competence. Such
problems are discussed other places in this report,
but also have direct consequences for the development
of evaluation forms.
Some means and purposes of evaluation include:
-
Tests
of digital skills, as in a computer card. As a point
of departure, one may look to the USA and Scotland
for ideas, among other places, where students master
different skills in the use of ICT, adapted to
progression at different levels.
-
Evaluation
of digital competence in specific subjects, with ICT
included in evaluation forms adapted to different
subjects and levels: mathematics, for example, where
spreadsheet programs may be used, word processing in
language subjects or drawing programs in art and
design.
-
Evaluation
of good learning strategies and deep knowledge in
subjects, as in meta-cognitive learning processes.
-
Evaluation
of digital folders from individual students and
projects.
-
Evaluation
of virtual collaboration, problem solving,
creativity, and interaction.
ITUÕs Main
Recommendations:
There should be a broad use
of digital technology in evaluation methods in
schools.
Digital evaluation methods
should be researched and tested for implementation in
schools.
Many students are digitally competent. Those
with the highest digital competence are characterized
as homo zappiens (see Wim Ween) – with
an ability to work with several media simultaneously
and with multi-cognitive and multi-processing
cognition. Such students will expect that it is
possible to work with interactive digital learning
resources: virtual laboratories, 3D-simulations over the
Internet, downloading of film/video, real time
collaboration on sound/video productions,
videoconference/web camera, production and
distribution of music, games, and edutainment.
The need for digital learning resources and
services are great both in educational and business
sectors. Good models for quality assurance are also
needed. The development of learning resources should
have the aim of continually expanding the borders and
combinations of disciplines, pedagogy, and structure.
These models should be based on the notion that
students of all ages and levels will learn more and
better independent of time and space through, for
example, net-based solutions. This means that content
and service providers may be both new and established
in the market.
The needs associated with content and services
will be different at various educational levels.
Researchers at universities and colleges need quite
different resources and services than elementary
school, and a manifold of these should be developed.
This will raise the competency need of those who
produce and those who use the resources.
ITU has developed a set of criteria for the
evaluation of learning resources:
Initiatives
such as NLN (National Learning Network) and digital
learning resources must be undertaken in relation to
a downscaling of analogue paper-based media. Support
for the production of paper-based media in elementary
and high schools for 2002, for example, included
Kopinor 83 million Norwegian crowns (Kopinor annual
report 2002) and school textbook publication 383
million Norwegian crowns (figures from Norwegian
Non-Fiction Writers and Translators Association -
NFFO, as reported in Dagens N¾ringsliv April 1, 2003).
ITU
recommends:
Support of
the National Learning Network that may encourage and
enable collaborative activity to secure the
development, exchange, and recycling of digital
services and content.
Media-rich
and complex learning resources within a multiple of
topics for all educational levels (see NLL report).
Resources
that may be used in various learning trajectories and
that are not ÒreadymadeÓ learning tools.
Use of
digital learning resources in learning trajectories
must emphasize accessibility, multiplicity, and
pedagogical variation.
Digital
learning resources should be free of charge for
students in elementary school and largely accessible
via the National Learning Network.
Measures
to stimulate the market for content production,
including comprehensive initiatives:
ITU
recommends:
á
The advisory
committee for NLN should develop a strategy for
digital learning resources for Project 2004-2007 by
September 10, 2003.
á
The advisory
committee for NLN should form a subcommittee for a
project in Project 2004-2007 that
works with pursuing recommendations from NLN and this
report. The subcommittee should develop concrete
suggestions for initiatives within digital learning
resources by September 15, 2003.
Elementary, high
school and teacher education institutions lag behind
other kinds of organizations in terms of actively
using ICT in leadership and administration
development. There is a need for innovation and
organization development with ICT in basic education
and teacher education. The innovation concept has
traditionally been linked to technology and economy
in business, but has been transferred to the
education sector; through national programs and
initiatives, education should be qualitatively improved
through innovative use of ICT. There is an
international movement where top down pressing
of ICT is followed up with increased support for
learning with ICT at the regional level.
School development
with ICT demands willingness to change and strong
school management. Effective implementation of ICT
demands a critical review of the means available in
terms of class time and course subjects. Teachers
must be provided time and opportunity to exchange
experiences, and the ICT infrastructure must be stable.
ITU
recommends:
All
schools must have a strategic ICT plan for the
development of the school as a flexible and learning
organization within 2005.
Implementing
of program (2004) for ICT school managers and school
development (ITU ICT ABC) based on
clusters with resources, based on national quality
standards.
All
schools must have software that supports the basic
functions within administration, management and
education within 2005.
All
schools must have a homepage on a website with
continually updated information for parents and
students within 2004.
All
schools must have a competency plan for teachers and
students within 2004.
ITU has
not evaluated this point. The concept digital
competence contributes to the further development of
basic education and the challenges represented by
lifelong learning.
Reading, writing,
calculating, collecting, storing, and treating
information are changed radically through
digitization of increasingly more fields in society.
In the book Digital Divides (2002),
Fr¿nes describes the digital society as a
communication society. This entails the ability to
produce communication as much as the ability to
interpret information. The digital society demands
the development of competence, both in relation to
the digital field, to IT production and development,
and in the general sense of increased demands for
basic competence. This trend is illustrated in the
large proportion of disabled persons who have reading
and writing problems. There is an increased demand
for reading and writing skills in the job market, as
well as digital competence.
Participation in the
digital society demands a high level of general
competence combined with digital user competence.
This poses challenges to schools in terms of
strengthening basic skills; reading, writing,
calculating. Professional and educational use of ICT
requires that students master the three basic skills;
for example, learning and administration systems such
as ClassFronter, ItÕs Learning, FirstClass, are based
on navigation through text. The three basic skills
are a precondition for developing good learning
strategies in relation to Internet and digital
learning resources.
Digitalization
Requires Good Writing Skills
Earlier in history, writing,
in the sense of a cohesive text, was not a prevalent
demand among the majority of the population. Today, a
farmer must write applications in digital format, a
nurse must keep digital journals with digital images
as attachments. Writing is not the mirror activity of
reading; different knowledge is required to compose a
message that will communicate with the reader.
Producing a text poses a number of formal demands to
how the text should function in a context; for
example, text with sound and images on a web page
places greater demands on presentation and design.
It is important to
develop skills in choosing, evaluating, and
organizing information for relevance in different
contexts. How to create a connection between
information bits from different contexts? Developing
skills such as comprehending, condensing and
critically evaluating are central. In these contexts,
guidance from competent teachers is important.
Demands will made for overview, structuring skills
and written presentation forms combined with concept
based knowledge,
In Digital Divides
(2002), Fr¿nes points to two
main challenges for education and digital competence
development in Norway: The competence of teachers as
digital users is weak, and large investments in
school ICT infrastructure is necessary. His
conclusion:
Digital Norway is
changing. However, despite expensive ring tones on
teenagersÕ cell phones, there are strong indications
that the country is moving more toward Kuwait than
California and Finland (Fr¿nes 2002:132).
Competence
and learning concepts today appear as the basis for a
transition to an information society. The challenge in
Norwegian society is neither the lack of nor access
to information; rather, it is the ability to learn to
develop competence throughout life. It is thus
necessary to focus on digital competence in the work
to counter digital divides.
ITU recommends:
As relatively large
differences exist in todayÕs Norwegian school in
terms of both access and the educational use of
computers, Internet and broadband, it must be a
national goal for schools to offer their students
good access to ICT. ICT must be integrated in
schoolwork methods to actively counter the
development of digital divides. All schools need
broadband to be able to give children adolescents the
competence they and society need in the future.
The Ministry of
Education in New Zealand has produced an ambitious
plan in which the concepts Digital Literacy and Information
Literacy have a central role. In Digital
Horizons. A strategy for
schools for 2002-2004, it reads: ÒGood
progress has been made through the previous strategy
in developing school ICT infrastructure, capability
and programmes. This strategy focuses on helping
schools to extend their use of ICT to support new
ways of teaching and learning.Ó
|
DEFINITIONS |
Information
literacy
is the ability to locate, evaluate, manipulate,
manage, and communicate information from different
sources. As learners become increasingly
information-literate, they develop skills in
discrimination, interpretation, and critical
analysis. ICT offers opportunities for higher-order
thinking and creativity in processing,
constructing, and conveying knowledge. |
http://www.minedu.govt.nz/index.cfm?layout=document&documentid=6760&data=I
In ITUÕs competency
plan for teachers in the project ICT in Multicultural
Schools, there are three proficiency levels that
correspond with phases in school development with
ICT: 1) Fundamental ICVT skills, 2) Disciplinary and
pedagogical use and competence, 3) Innovative ICT
competence. This three-stage model is based on the
understanding that school development with ICT
requires all teachers to have the necessary fundamental
ICT skills. The fundamental ICT skills include:
In eEurope, the plan
approved by European leaders in Lisbon in March 2000
contains the following goal: ÒÉto become the most
competitive and dynamic knowledge based economy in
the world capable of sustainable economic growth with
more and better jobs and greater social cohesion.Ó
This is followed up in e-Learning –
Designing Tomorrow's Education
(Commission of the European Communities 2002): ÒeLearning seeks to
mobilise the educational and cultural communities, as
well as the economic and social players in Europe, in
order to speed up changes in the education and
training systems for Europe's move to a
knowledge-based society.
Digital competence
and digital bildung are central concepts in EUÕs
plans: ÒThe first essential stage in this move is
the acquisition by the citizens of Europe of the
confident use of the new tools for accessing
knowledge and the widespread development of a
'digital literacy' – adapted
to the different learning contexts and target
groupsÉthe emergence of the knowledge-based society
implies that every citizen must be 'digitally
literate' and basic skills
in order to be on a better footing in terms of equal
opportunities in a world in which digital functions
are proliferatingÓ.
This is reiterated in
Proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament
and of the Council Adopting a Multi-Annual Programme
(2004-2006) for the effective integration of ICT in
education and training systems in Europe (Brussels,
December 19, 2002): ÒIn the eLearning Action
Plan1, Ôe-learningÕ was defined a Ôthe use of new
multimedia technologies and the Internet to improve
the quality of learning by facilitating access to
resources and services as well as remote exchanges
and collaborationÕÓ. However, Ôe-learningÕ has become
shorthand for a vision in which Information and
Communication Technologies (ICT)-mediated learning is
an integral component of education and training
systems. In such a scenario, the ability to use ICT
becomes a new form of literacy - "digital
literacy." Digital literacy thus becomes as important
as ÒclassicÓ literacy and numeracy were one hundred
years ago; without it, citizens can neither
participate fully in society nor acquire the skills
and knowledge necessary for the 21st centuryÉdigital
literacy needs to be addressed, taking into account
the many facets of how the use of the Internet and
electronic devices can become part of everyday
practices. On the one hand, the use of the Internet
presupposes sound proficiency in the mother tongue
and other languages, and other basic skills. On the
other hand, a whole range of new competencies
is required: media competences; creating, producing
and using new digital services; designing new
educational objects and games. European countries
should address the full range of proficiencies that
are required and revisit the teaching of basic
educational skills. Only then can the Internet serve
as a stimulus to learning by extending the physical
boundaries of the classroom through access to
information and communication environments.
According
to the Summit of 21st Century Literacy, Berlin
2002, new approaches emphasize the abilities to
use information and knowledge that extend beyond the
traditional base of reading, writing, and math.
Teachers,
students, employees, and citizens must now
incorporate the following components to enhance their
knowledge and critical thinking skills:
Technology
Literacy: The ability to use
new media such as the Internet to access and
communicate information effectively.
Information
Literacy: The ability to
gather, organize, and evaluate information, and to
form valid opinions based on the results.
Media
Creativity: The growing capacity
of citizens everywhere to produce and distribute
content to audiences of all sizes.
Global
Literacy: Understanding the
interdependence among people and nations and having
the ability to interact and collaborate successfully
across cultures.
Literacy with
Responsibility: The competence to
consider the social consequences of media from the
standpoint of safety, privacy, and other issues.
http://21stcenturyliteracy.org/whatis/
Sweden has integrated
ICT in school relatively goal-oriented for many
years. The vision of Sweden as a leading knowledge
society has encouraged large investing in recent
years. A flagship in this respect is the it is
program, which has primarily focused on
infrastructure, teacher competence and digital
learning resources. Two significant changes have now
given work with ICT in school new direction. Firstly,
the school curriculum is divided in two, with the
newly established Office for School Development
assumes responsibility for ICT initiatives. Secondly,
the ITiS-program has ceased to exist. In earlier
policy documents, references are scant to concepts of
ICT as a basic skill, digital bildung, or literacy.
The initiative has also been critiqued for an
insufficient focus on the educational use of ICT, and
the lack of a clear strategy for developing the
student role toward knowledge production. This is
again linked to the view of ICT as a part of the
guidelines of digital bildung.
The concept of
digital bildung is nonetheless
present in Swedish plans. The committee for new ICT strategies
in school, led by Jan HylŽn, presented a final report
in October 2002, which reads: ÒThe question should be
considered as to whether the educational plan should
state as a goal the handling of ICT mentally and
technically. Further, the educational system should
examine the IT situation first and foremost from an
equality perspective, in regard to the development of
competence for school personnel and investments and
maintenance in municipal schools.Ó
The use of the
concept is nonetheless downplayed in relation to the
preliminary report from May, which recommended that
concepts and understandings of digital bildung should
be included in course plans and curriculum in the
future:
(www.it
is.gov.se/publikationer/eng/interim report.pdf)
Sweden is
committed to providing the whole of its population
with a 'digital culture' and basic skills to create
better conditions in a world where digital
communication is expanding. A more common description
of the knowledge required is that referred to in
English as "digital literacy," which in
Swedish terms is translated to basic digital
competence.
This should not be
understood as a requirement for technical knowledge,
but rather linking together skills and knowledge
about technology, the ability to relate ICT to the
surrounding society and giving prominence to creative
elements in learning.
The question of
introducing into the curriculum "digital
competence," namely the ability to handle information
technology and large amounts of information, both
mentally and technically, should be considered.
It is further
emphasized that ICT accessibility, together with
teacher ICT competence is an egalitarian right, on
par with other demands for quality in school.
Canada has a long
tradition in developing visions and coordinating
plans for ICT in society. In 1997, the federal organ
Information Highway Advisory Council (IHAC) pointed
out in Preparing Canada for a Digital World that
digital literacy is necessary for survival in a
network and information society, and that this is
best provided by the school system. Canadian
officials followed up with the program ÓConnecting
CanadiansÓ to link schools, libraries, and historical
institutions on the Internet. The progam refers to
the necessity of certain skills, recognizing the need
for Òhelping our citizens to develop the skills
necessary to flourish in the new environmentÓ
(Minister of Industry, April 2000).
In the plans for
SchoolNet, we again meet the concept Òdigital
literacyÓ specified in relation to studentsÕ needs: ÒSchoolNet
encourages the integration of information technology
into Canada's education system to help students
acquire digital literacy skills and experience in
using the Internet for research and communicationÓ (CanadaÕs
SchoolNet, 2000).
In strategic
educational policy planning for the department, DfES
is mentioned as a collaborative partner that aims to
achieve a more effective integration of ICT in
learning processes. (http://www.dfes.gov.uk/delivering-results/docs/Startegic
Framework.doc)
The aims are
specified through the document Transforming the
Way We
Learn: A Vision
for the Future of ICT in Schools.
(http://www.dfes.gov.uk/ictfutures/) Digital and
visual bildung are essential to
success in an information society, and are understood
as follows.
'Digital
literacy' describes effective
information handling, including the ability to:
Identify, locate,
and retrieve relevant information.
Discern and
evaluate.
Assess the
provenance, reliability, and accuracy of
information and arguments.
Present in an
appropriate style and medium.
'Visual
literacy' describes
effective interpretation and production of visual
imagery, including the ability to:
Translate thinking
and creativity into effective
presentations.
Manipulate a
variety of media, including video.
Appreciate
aesthetic values.
Although the concepts
are linked to an argument about new collaboration
forms and greater possibilities for creative
expression, it is nonetheless striking that the
definition appears under a point titled ÓNew
opportunities to gain key skills for the knowledge
economy.Ó DfES focuses on ÓskillsÓ and makes little
distinction between what we in Norwegian call skills
and competence. Further, the concept is closely
linked to being successful in an information economy,
in keeping with the common goal of ICT initiatives in
the UK to increase competitiveness.
In its strategy for
ICT in education, the related organ National Grid for
Learning states a number of instrumental goals for
what an increased ICT initiative in school should
contain, among others Óensuring that school leavers
have a good understanding of ICT, with measures in
place for assessing their competence in itÓ. (http://www.ngfl.gov.uk/about_ngfl/background.jsp)
The concept content is
associated with an understanding of bildung, but is guided to a larger
extent by a quantifiable use that may be easily
linked to here-and-now skills such as spreadsheets,
word processing, etc.
Andresen, Bent B.
(1999). Skolen I tiden (School in Time).
Veile: Kroghs.
Aufderheide,
P. & Firestone, C. (1993). Media Literacy.
Queenstown: The Aspen Institute.
Commission
of the European Communities. (2002). e-Learning
– Designing tomorrow's education.
Descy, P.
& Tessaring M. ( 2002). Kompetenceopbygning
for fremtiden –
Uddannelse og
l¾ring i Europa (Building Competence
for the Future – Education and Learning in
Europe). Cedefop Reference series 9.
Luxembourg:
Kontoret for De Europ¾iske F¾llesskabers Officielle
Publikationer.
DeSeCo (Definition
and Selection of Competences). OECD:
2002.
Educational Testing Service. (2001). Digital
Transformation. A Framework for ICT Literacy. http://www.ets.org/research/ictliteracy/ictreport.pdf
Fr¿nes, Ivar. (2002).
Digitale skiller (Digital Divides).
Oslo: Fagbokforlaget.
Gilster, Paul.
(1997). Digital Literacy. New York:
John Wiley.
H¯YKOMskole. (2003).
Fleksible l¾ringsarenaer og digital kompetanse. Om
fremtidig behov for bredbŒnd (Flexible Learning
Arenas and Digital Competence. On Future Needs for
Broadband). (0.9 versjon)
ICTE. (1998). National
Educational Technology. Standards for students. Nets.
ITU.
(2001). Rammeplan for kompetanseutvikling. Prosjekt
IKT i flerkulturelle skoler, Oslo indre ¯st (Policy
for Competence Development. Project ICT in
Multicultural Schools. Oslo East).
Learning
and Teaching Scotland. (2000). 5-14 National
Guidelines. Information and Communications
Technology.
Ministry
of Education. (2002). Digital Horizons - Learning
through ICT. New Zealand. http://www.minedu.govt.nz/index.cfm?layout=document&documentid=6760&data=l
Nasjonalt L¾ringsnett
– et nettverk for e-l¾ring og samarbeid
(National Learning Network – A Network for
eLearning and Collaboration). (2003). (0.9 version).
NOU. (2003). I
f¿rste rekke (In the First Row).
Kvalitetsutvalget.
http://odin.dep.no/ufd/norsk/aktuelt/pressem/045071-990208/index-dok000-b-n-a.html-
OECD. (2001). Education
Policy Analysis.
Papert, Seymour.
(1980). Mindstorms. Harvester Press.
Summit of 21st
Century Literacy. (2002). http://21stcenturyliteracy.org/whatis/
Tyner, Kathleen.
(1998). Literacy in a Digital World. New
Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
UNESCO
(1972). Learning to Be: The World of Education
Today and Tomorrow. Paris: UNESCO
Utbildningsdepartementet
(2002). E-lŠrande som utmaning.
http://www.itis.gov.se/publikationer/
slutrapport_e-larande.pdf
U.S.
Department of Education. (1983). A Nation at Risk:
The imperative for educational reform.
Washington D.C.
Wood, David. (2002).The
THINK Report. Brussels: European
Schoolnet.
Whitehead,
Martha J. & Quinlan, Catherine A. (2002). Canada:
An Information Literacy Case Study, White
Paper prepared for UNESCO, the U.S. National
Commission on Libraries and Information Science, and
the National Forum on Information Literacy, for use
at the Information Literacy Meeting of Experts,
Prague, The Czech Republic.
http://www.nclis.gov/libinter/infolitconf&meet/papers/quinlan-fullpaper.pdf
[1] Debates on the concept of bildung run in two veins: a collective concept concerned with what is the true and correct cultural inheritance, and an individual concept with a focus on the ÓselfÓ culture and identity. See Rune Slagstad, et.al. (eds.): Dannelsens forvandlinger (BildungÕs Transformations) Oslo: Pax (2003).
[2] The National Commission on Excellence in Education (USA) acknowledged the need for a curriculum that would produce Ótechnology literateÓ high school students as early as 1983. Basic skills entailed that students would: Óa) understand the computer as an information computation and communicating device; b) use the computer in the study of the other basics and for personal and work-related purposes; and c) understand the world of computers, electronics, and related technologiesÓ (U.S. Department of Education, 1983, p. 26).
[3] 12 countries contributed to DeSeCo – A summary report. Uni Peter Trier, University of Neuch‰tel, on behalf of the Swiss Federal Statistical Office
[4] Media Literacy is the ability of a citizen to access, analyze and produce information for specific outcomes. (Aufderheide & Firestone, 1993)
[6] In addition to the bildung perspective the curriculum also has a more instrumental view on disciplinary knowledge.
[7] Seymour Papert moves in the direction of digital bildung in Mindstorms (1980) when he uses the concept fluency, or being technologically fluid, in relation to computers: everyone may learn to use a computer in a competent manner.