|
Strip of the first Machin multivalue coil (pre-decimal)
|
|
My Machin Collection
|
|
Pre(r)amble |
I am aflicted with what I have coined "Machinites", the urge and desire to identify and collect as many different issues and varieties of the UK Queen Elisabeth II definitives called Machins (after the artist Arnold Machin designing the stamps), first issued in 1968 (the "d" and sh. pre-decimals) and in 1971 with new value tablet letters (in "p" values, the decimals). The design is continously in use in a stream of new values and varieties, making this definitive series probably the most numerous in existence.
When
I got hold of my first lot of kiloware, around 1980, I thought the task was
manageable with a reasonable effort. Many years later, getting more deeply into
the matter, the task is daunting, frustrating, challenging and gives lots of
great collecting joys.
The aim of these web-pages are several, primarily to aid me in contacting other collectors similarly aflicted. I need contacts to discuss and exchange views on my collecting interests, and possibly to trade. Thus I hope to present my collection and my want lists. And I want to share my experiences, and to present some of my ideas on suitable collecting areas for the emerging Machin collector, as a follow up on my previous answers to e-mail requests for advise. Note that over the last years, excellent information has become available on the net. For a good list of web-pages, which I find uneccessary to repeat, see "Other Macin Sites" on
Before getting into describing in detail my collecting experiences and findings, I have to introduce my general views on Machin collecting, to explain my level of collecting and what features I study. I adhere strongly to the Myall collecting scheme, although I have come across a few cases, as will be described, where my findings do seem to be in disagreement with the descriptions.
![]() |
| The first issue of Macin Decimals in February 1971 |
Introducing Machin collecting.
One important decision to make when creating a Machin collection, is to what area, scope and detail one should limit oneself. The number of variations is considerable, and a complete coverage would undoubtedly exhaust at least my patience and stamp budget. The evident advice is to start with the more obvious, which already can be rewarding, and as experience is gained, make further choices.
In my own case I began by studying cancelled clippings, from kiloware. My main collection is still cancelled singles, but I have found collecting booklet panes and coils strips, which also exist in considerabel variation, an extension being both helpful for understanding the singles as well as rewarding in itself. Where as kiloware usually is easily and obtainable at reasonable prices, collecting booklets requires bying from dealers, at auctions and as lots, or trading with other collectors.
It may be helpful initially to review the most prominent features and characteristics of Machin variation, in addition to the obvious: The different main features of postage value and colour combination, the lowest level of Machin collection. When assaulting a new batch of kiloware, my intial approach is always to separate into value and colour. And of course separating out regionals (with the symbols of Scotland, Wales or N.Ireland beside the Queens head) and the special stamps with straight, unperforated edges (not common). My next stages of separation are:
The last is the most time consuming and ultimate identifying stage, mostly boring but occassionally greatly rewarding when new variations are unearthed.
I also carefully save any se-tenant pairs (different valued pairs) as they normally uniqually identify their multivalued booklet or coil source. Pairs in general should be kept in case they stem from booklets, identified by their outer edge knife-cut teeth.
What then is needed for identification in a Machin collectors bag of tricks?
Catalogues: A good special catalogue is a must. To my knowledge, only two meet the requirements of any serious effort. By far the most detailed and authorative work is "The Complete Deegam Machin Handbook", by Douglas Myall, where the second edition was issued in 1996 (with a later supplement in 1999). Again, full reference is found among Robin Harris pages: http://www.adminware.ca/mdeegam.htm.
I will make numerous references to this work, which I denote by DH. In all its detail, this book tells it all, but requires patience and work to penetrate. The introductory chapters are a gold mine of information about the Machin issues, and well worth the effort to study. And to the beginning student, do not despair at the apparent complexities of the Myall classification scheme. For the less ambitious collector, much of the gory detail of his level 3 can be ignored or simplified to suit your interests. In any case, no other work is as helpful and comprehensive in identifying the various varieties. Hopefully, further descriptions of my collecting methods can be of help.
The other useful catalogue is is "The Connoisseur Catalogue of Machin Stamps", edited by James Negus, (subtitle "Machins made intelligible"). They also issue a complete stamp album for Machin stamps. One place to order is from Vera Trinder Ltd., 38 Bedford Street, Strand, WC2E 9EU, UK. Phone +44 171 836 2365 or 8332, Fax +44 171 836 0873. My information here may be from a few years back, so the phone numbers should be checked. This catalogue is less detailed but may give a better overview. It also carries price information, which may be a pointer as to rarety (something sorely missing in the DH). As to catalogues, note further that the Stanley Gibbons Specialised catalogues may contain much useful information on the issues themselves, but is in my opinion, useless for identifying types and varieties.
UV-lamp: To be able to recognise phosphor bands and phosphor- and fluorescent papers is important for identifying Machin varieties, actually one of the main features. This is well explained in DH. Here it suffices to inform that a lamp emitting short-wave (or high energy) ultraviolet light is a neccessary tool for viewing the bands and papers. Note that this lamp (or the light source) is different from the long-wave (or low energy) uv-lamp needed for viewing most other luminescent European stamps, which also are usually fluorescent, that is light up only when the uv-light is on. The phosphorescent Machins are viewed by their afterglow, which can be seen for a short while after the light source is turned off. This means that it it necessary to work in the dark, and keep the eyes shut during illumination to keep them accomodated to darkness. Remember that uv-light is harmful to your eyes, and should never be viewed directly.
Note that bands come in a series of distinct types, the most common (sheets and booklets) are bands 9.5 mm wide across the perforation, leaving 2 bands on each stamp. Another common type is 1 center band, 4 mm wide. In some booklets 8 mm wide bands across the perforation are used, giving a 2 banded stamp with a slightly wider non-banded middle than the common 9.5 mm type. In addition, short band types, not reaching the perforated edge, notced bands and narrower types abound. These are throrougly described in the literature. When relevant I intend to refer to such bands when treating the types I try to identify for my collection.
There is one important working rule when collecting phosphorescent Machins from clippings: Whenever possible DO NOT SOAK OFF PAPER BEFORE IDENTIFICATION ! The water-soaking process somehow influences the phosphorescent chemicals and considerably weakens the effect, in my experience. Some band varieties are hard to identify, as well as being less common. This is particularly the case for the "short band" varieties (again referring to DH for a comprenhensive overview and classification.)
Slanting light: As most collectors observe, the phosphor bands can often be seen by the naked eye on the stamp surface. Particularly when viewed in slanting light, so that the light is reflected off the stamp surface, the bands turn up with different reflectivity from the non-banded part of the surface. For instance, this method is usually sufficient to identify the ph. varieties of the UK comemmoratives of the 60s, rarer than their non-ph. counterparts.
Slanting light reflection is also useful for identifying papers varieties. The 1968 and on pre-decimals were printed on a paper noted as OCP, Originally Coated Paper, as were the first series of decimals, from 1971 and for a short time. Another paper came into use later in 71, named FCP, Fluorescent Coated Paper. In principle it should be possible to distinguish these papers by their fluorescence, but I have found the best method again to use slanting light. The OCP stamps appear shiny, with the Queens head almost photo-negative. The FCP paper appears matte, without the effect. The pre-decimals can be used for OCP reference.
Slanting light is moreover useful for separating the two papers PCP1, which is again matte, and PCP2 which is shiny (and the paper normally appear stiffer and curl slightly), both from the early 80s.
And one paper PPP, used only for 1p, 2p, and 10p orange in 1979, is looking like abrasive paper in reflective light, reasonably easy to identify.
Slanting light is also the only method I know how to distinguish the various varnished and coated stamps, all done in an effort to preserve the stamp surface during handling.
You can easily identify a Machin collector by his reflective motion of lifting a stamp against the light.
Magnifier: A magnifier, at least x 10, preferrably with a built in lightsource, and extremely helpful, a built in ruler in mm or even smaller divisions, is a necessity for studying variations in value tablet positions. I have a flashlight type with a transparent ruler, handy for studying at your leisure. I also always keep spare bulbs and batteries, to avoid being lost in the middle of an exciting batch.
Information
on head types: The head shown on the stamps, come in slightly different
types, well described in the catalogues. Mostly one type is used for all stamps
in any issued value. Some notable exceptions exist, such as several of the pre-decimals
come in distinctly different heads (A and B, click on picture). For the early
1 p issues, both heads B1 and a lower placed type B2
are found, as also for several other. Were head information is important for identification,
this will be included when I get on to details of my own collecting methods.
Information on knife-cut edges (booklets and coils): To me, booklet information is essential for a number of identifying tasks. One of the strong points of the Myall methods in DH, is describing how stamp edges often are knife-cut during booklet and coil production. This shows normally up very well under the magnifier, were the regular cut edges of the stamp teeth can easily be identified. Depending on the location in the booklet, the top, right, bottom, left, one or two sides may be cut. Again, DH displays the stamp arrangement in all issued booklets, a great help in identification. Horizontal coils are cut top and bottom (normally), vertical coils left and right. The non-cut sides show up by the ragged edge of the torn teeth. Sheet stamps have four ragged edges, unfortunately also stamps from some larger booklet panes, notably from the Prestige booklets. Ragged teeth may also be found on booklet stamps normally knife-cut, but badly aligned so that a tear off strip remains beyond the teeth on one side, and has been pulled off. Thus the lack of a knife-cut edge is no total assurance that the stamp is from a sheet.
Note that some booklets are made so that stamps have straight, un-perforated edges. These are easy to identify.
Information on print-direction: Most booklets and coils are printed sidewise. Again DH gives a full description. The notable feature is found under magnification of the outer edges of the coloured stamp face. In the print direction the coloured ink is left with small spiked teeth showing up (usually) along the edge, like miniature teeth of a saw. The opposite edge has rounded, not very prominent teeth. Some experience is needed to use this feature for identification. One useful excersise is sorting se-tenant pairs or panes from early booklets or coils. As to sheet stamps, these are printed mostly upright. Some issues are identified as inverted. With a trained eye I find this feature not too elusive, and very useful. I collect the right (SR) and left (SL) printed stamps as two distinct varieties.
Value tablets and positions: In the DH a reasonably clear scheme for caracterising tablet positions is used. The scheme is very helpful in identifying variant positions. Any variant 0,25 mm in the up, down, right of left position from a defined norm, is given a separate identifier. The scheme is copyrighted. I will in my descriptions use high, low, right and left from norm as identifiers.
Furthermore tablets may vary according to number or letter type, such as varying thickness, usually clearly identified as to source.
Sweat-box: A few issues in the mid 80s came with blue imprints (Ds and stars) on the glue. These were discounted and thus marked. When soaking thoroughly, the imprint dissappears with the glue. To search for stamps with imprints the aedvise is to use a "sweat-box", a moisture tight container where the stamp clipping is suspended (in a grid or net) above a water filled bottom. After a while the stamp can be peeled off with the gum sufficiently intact to show the imprint. Note however, that classifying a stamp as the normal, no-imprint variety from used, soaked material, may not be possible, as it may as well be soaked well enough to remove the imprint. If the paper backing is not too thick or dark in colour, it is sometimes possible to spot the imprint by reverse light through the back. Suitable stamps may be collected with a thin backing showing no imprint. In this way it may also be possible to select stamps for sweat-box treatment, instead of searcing larger numbers "blind".
Cancellation dates: When a stamp is found showing a clear cancellation date, this may be very helpful as the first day of issue is normally well known for all. For instance to safely identify OCP varieties against FCP, or other elusive differences.
My Machin collection